https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/secret-prior-art-office-actions-lynk-labs-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-13T11:40:25+09:00Secret Prior Art in 25% of Office Actions: Patently-O’s Empirical Study and the Lynk Labs Cert Denial https://www.patent-detectives.com/secret-prior-art-office-actions-lynk-labs/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-13T11:40:24+09:00「秘密の先行技術」が拒絶理由の25%に——Patently-O大規模分析と最高裁Lynk Labs上告拒否の意味 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/trump-section232-patented-pharma-tariff-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-13T11:40:23+09:00Trump Invokes Section 232 to Impose 100% Tariff on Patented Pharmaceutical Imports https://www.patent-detectives.com/trump-section232-patented-pharma-tariff/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-13T11:40:22+09:00トランプ政権、特許医薬品の輸入にSection 232関税100%を発動——MFN価格合意で免除の道も https://www.patent-detectives.com/apple-foldable-docking-station-patent-2026/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-13T02:06:48+09:00Appleのマルチデバイス充電向けフォルダブルドッキングステーション特許が成立 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/doj-sep-antitrust-samsung-netlist-standard-market-power-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T08:13:10+09:00DOJ Files SEP Antitrust Brief in Samsung-Netlist Case, Reiterates That Standard Adoption Does Not Confer Market Power https://www.patent-detectives.com/doj-sep-antitrust-samsung-netlist-standard-market-power/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T08:13:09+09:00司法省が再びSEP独禁法クレームを牽制——Samsung対Netlist訴訟への意見書で「規格採択は市場支配力を生まない」と主張 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/jpo-ip-achievement-award-2026-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T08:11:57+09:00Japan’s FY2026 IP Achievement Awards Announced — Toray, Panasonic, Toyota Among 31 Honorees https://www.patent-detectives.com/jpo-ip-achievement-award-2026/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T08:11:56+09:00令和8年度「知財功労賞」発表——東レ・パナソニック・トヨタなど31者を選定、4月17日に表彰式 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/apple-xiao-i-supreme-court-20260412-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T02:20:24+09:00China’s Supreme People’s Court Confirms Xiao-I AI Patent Validity——Apple Appeal Dismissed, Risk Factor Highlights Market Concerns https://www.patent-detectives.com/apple-xiao-i-supreme-court-20260412/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T02:20:23+09:00中国最高人民法院がXiao-I AI特許有効性を最終確定——Apple上訴却下、大中華売上牽制と知財リスク https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/cnipa-2026-ip-plan-sep-20260412-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T02:20:23+09:00China’s CNIPA Releases 2026 IP Administrative Protection Work Plan—Focus on SEP Dispute Resolution and Comprehensive Trademark Law Revision https://www.patent-detectives.com/cnipa-2026-ip-plan-sep-20260412/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T02:20:22+09:00中国CNIPA、2026年知財行政保護工作方案を公表——SEP紛争の行政調停新規則と商標法全面改定が焦点 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-smed-ai-101-20260412-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T02:20:20+09:00USPTO’s Subject Matter Eligibility Declarations Reshape AI Patent Section 101 Review https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-smed-ai-101-20260412/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T02:20:19+09:00USPTO「SMEDs」導入で転換するAI特許の101条審査 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/openai-patent-portfolio-110-hardware-strategy-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-12T02:05:37+09:00Full Analysis of OpenAI’s 110-Patent Portfolio: A Filing Strategy That Points to Hardware https://www.patent-detectives.com/openai-patent-portfolio-110-hardware-strategy/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-12T02:05:11+09:00OpenAI特許ポートフォリオ110件の全分析——ハードウェア参入を示唆する出願戦略 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/cnipa-2026-ip-protection-work-plan-export-control-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-11T18:11:59+09:00China’s CNIPA Releases 2026 IP Administrative Protection Work Plan: Tighter Export Controls and Emerging Technology Focus https://www.patent-detectives.com/cnipa-2026-ip-protection-work-plan-export-control/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-11T18:11:29+09:00中国国家知識産権局、2026年知的財産行政保護業務計画を発表——IP輸出管理の強化と越境知財規制の新動向 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/universal-electronics-roku-ipr-remote-control-cafc-2026-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-11T18:10:37+09:00Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s IPR Invalidation of Universal Electronics Remote Control Patent in Roku Dispute https://www.patent-detectives.com/universal-electronics-roku-ipr-remote-control-cafc-2026/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-11T18:10:13+09:00連邦巡回控訴裁判所、RokuによるIPRでUniversal Electronics社のリモコン特許クレームを無効と認定したPTAB判断を支持 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/in-re-mcfadden-section-101-information-exchange-2026-en/パテント探偵社en2026-04-11T18:09:27+09:00Federal Circuit Upholds PTAB’s Section 101 Rejection of Information Exchange Patent Application: In re McFadden (2026) https://www.patent-detectives.com/in-re-mcfadden-section-101-information-exchange-2026/パテント探偵社ja2026-04-11T18:08:56+09:00連邦巡回控訴裁判所、情報交換システム特許出願の35 U.S.C.§101不適格を支持——In re McFadden事件