<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/assets/sitemap-news.xsl?ver=5.7.2"?>
<!-- generated-on="2026-04-05T21:33:46+00:00" -->
<!-- generator="XML Sitemap & Google News for WordPress" -->
<!-- generator-url="https://status301.net/wordpress-plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/" -->
<!-- generator-version="5.7.2" -->
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" >
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/sake-trademark-squatting-overseas-madpro-guide/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-06T02:03:36+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>知らないと損する！海外で「日本酒ブランド」が丸ごと盗まれる商標先取りトラブルの実態と対策</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/pro-codes-act-standards-copyright-senate-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T18:20:26+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>U.S. Senate Reintroduces Pro Codes Act: Safety Standards Copyright Debate Returns as SDOs and Public Interest Groups Clash</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/pro-codes-act-standards-copyright-senate-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T18:19:46+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>安全基準の著作権保護をめぐる議会論争——米上院「Pro Codes Act（S.4145）」が再上程、基準設定団体と公益団体が衝突</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/doj-frand-sep-kallay-antitrust-policy-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T18:18:51+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>DOJ Frames FRAND as the Antitrust &#8216;Safety Valve&#8217; for Standards Development—Deputy AAG Kallay Speaks at CSIS LeadershIP 2026</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/doj-frand-sep-kallay-antitrust-policy-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T18:18:09+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>米司法省、標準必須特許のFRAND義務を競争法上の「安全弁」と位置づけ——CSISカンファレンスでカレー副長官補が政策立場を表明</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/tentales-tiktok-section-101-content-patent-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:15:27+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Rules Social-Network Content Personalization Patent Ineligible Under § 101: TikTok Prevails</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/tentales-tiktok-section-101-content-patent/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:15:17+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、ソーシャル情報に基づくコンテンツ個人化特許を第101条で非適格と判断——TikTok・ByteDanceが勝訴</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/tesla-ev-charging-climate-patent-cafc-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:15:06+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Splits on Tesla EV Charging Patent: Claim 1 Obvious, Time-Calculation Claims Survive</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/tesla-ev-charging-climate-patent-cafc/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:14:55+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、テスラのEV充電中気候制御特許を一部破棄——請求項1は自明、時間算出機能を含む請求項は有効確認</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/centripetal-keysight-cybersecurity-patent-cafc-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:14:41+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB: Centripetal Networks Cybersecurity Patent Anticipated by Cisco User Guide</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/centripetal-keysight-cybersecurity-patent-cafc/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T08:14:29+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、Centripetal Networksのサイバーセキュリティ特許をシスコ製品文書が先行開示と認定——PTABのIPR決定を支持</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/trademark-bully-large-company-sme-defense/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-05T02:03:30+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>あの有名ブランドが「商標いじめ」！大企業が中小を攻撃する商標権濫用の実態と自衛策</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-ptab-life-sciences-patent-thicket-session-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T18:24:45+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO&#8217;s First Life Sciences PTAB Listening Session Surfaces Fundamental Divide Over Patent Validity and Drug Competition</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-ptab-life-sciences-patent-thicket-session-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T18:24:04+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO、ライフサイエンス特許とPTABの役割を議論——第1回リスニングセッションで特許有効性をめぐる構造的対立が表面化</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/fortress-iron-coinventor-invalidation-federal-circuit-256-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T18:22:59+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit&#8217;s First-Impression Ruling: Unreachable Coinventor Dooms Fortress Iron Patents Under 35 U.S.C. § 256(b)</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/fortress-iron-coinventor-invalidation-federal-circuit-256/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T18:22:16+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回控訴裁が初判断——連絡不能の共同発明者を追加できず、Fortress Ironの2件の特許が無効に</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/trump-pharma-tariff-executive-order-patent-drug-manufacturing-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T08:11:54+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Trump Signs Executive Order Imposing Up to 100% Tariffs on Patented Pharmaceutical Imports Lacking U.S. Manufacturing</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/trump-pharma-tariff-executive-order-patent-drug-manufacturing/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T08:11:17+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>トランプ大統領が医薬品輸入に最大100%関税を課す大統領令に署名——国内製造未実施の特許医薬品企業を標的</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/tiktok-ipr-vacated-tianma-chinese-government-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T08:09:53+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO Director Squires Vacates Seven TikTok IPRs Over Chinese Government Real-Party-in-Interest Question</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/tiktok-ipr-vacated-tianma-chinese-government/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-04T08:09:13+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>TikTokのIPR申請7件をUSPTO長官が無効化——中国政府機関が「真の当事者」か否か争点、Tianma先例を適用</news:title></news:news></url>
</urlset>
