https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/nesarikar-cafc-microentity-standing-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-14T08:10:33+09:00Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Nesarikar v. USPTO Pro Se Suit Over Micro-Entity Denial and Article III Standing https://www.patent-detectives.com/nesarikar-cafc-microentity-standing/パテント探偵社ja2026-05-14T08:10:31+09:00連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、Nesarikar対USPTOで本人訴訟を棄却維持――マイクロエンティティ資格否認とArticle III原告適格 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-design-patent-guidance-gui-vr-ar-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-14T08:10:29+09:00USPTO Modernizes Design Patent Examination for GUIs, Icons, and VR/AR – Dropping the Strijland-Era Screen Requirement https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-design-patent-guidance-gui-vr-ar/パテント探偵社ja2026-05-14T08:10:28+09:00USPTO、GUI・アイコン・VR/AR意匠の審査運用を現代化――Strijland時代のスクリーン破線描画要件を撤廃 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/extremity-medical-nextremity-section-285-ipr-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-14T08:07:45+09:00Federal Circuit Rules Section 285 Fee Awards Do Not Reach Parallel IPR Proceedings in Extremity Medical v. Nextremity https://www.patent-detectives.com/extremity-medical-nextremity-section-285-ipr/パテント探偵社ja2026-05-14T08:07:29+09:00連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、特許§285の弁護士費用償還はIPR手続には及ばないと判示――Extremity Medical対Nextremity https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/ptab-crispr-broad-institute-priority-2026-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-14T02:05:15+09:00PTAB Decision Upholds Broad Institute’s CRISPR Priority in Landmark Patent Ruling https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/enviro-tech-safe-foods-cafc-about-indefiniteness-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-13T08:13:38+09:00Federal Circuit Holds ‘About’ Indefinite in pH Range Claim — Enviro Tech v. Safe Foods Precedential Opinion https://www.patent-detectives.com/enviro-tech-safe-foods-cafc-about-indefiniteness/パテント探偵社ja2026-05-13T08:13:10+09:00連邦巡回区控訴裁判所、特許クレームの「about（約）」を不明確と認定――Enviro Tech対Safe Foods、Lourie判事執筆の先例的判決 https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/epo-g125-description-amendment-oral-proceedings-en/パテント探偵社en2026-05-13T08:12:22+09:00EPO Enlarged Board Concludes Oral Proceedings in G 1/25, Signals Continued Mandatory Description Adaptation https://www.patent-detectives.com/epo-g125-description-amendment-oral-proceedings/パテント探偵社ja2026-05-13T08:11:48+09:00欧州特許庁拡大審判部、明細書補正義務をめぐるG 1/25の口頭審理を終結――「クレーム整合性」原則の維持に傾斜