<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/assets/sitemap-news.xsl?ver=5.7.2"?>
<!-- generated-on="2026-04-28T21:24:20+00:00" -->
<!-- generator="XML Sitemap & Google News for WordPress" -->
<!-- generator-url="https://status301.net/wordpress-plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/" -->
<!-- generator-version="5.7.2" -->
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" >
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/teva-lilly-cgrp-antibody-patent-cafc-177m-verdict-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T08:25:26+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Reinstates $177 Million Verdict in Teva v. Lilly CGRP Antibody Patent Case</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/escapex-ip-google-patent-sanctions-scotus-denied-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T08:18:13+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>SCOTUS Denies Cert in EscapeX v. Google: $254,827 in Frivolous Patent Sanctions Stand</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/teva-lilly-cgrp-antibody-patent-cafc-177m-verdict/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T08:16:54+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回控訴裁、Teva対Lilly事件でCGRP抗体特許の1億7,700万ドル評決を復活——Amgen最高裁判決の射程を抗体方法クレームに限定</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/escapex-ip-google-patent-sanctions-scotus-denied/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T08:16:52+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>「最初から根拠なし」——米最高裁がEscapeX対Google特許訴訟の上告を棄却、254,827ドルの制裁金が確定</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/youtube-video-copyright-lawsuit-apple-openai-amazon-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-28T02:05:48+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>YouTube動画を無断学習——Apple・OpenAI・Amazonが著作権集団訴訟に直面</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-patent-term-adjustment-318-days-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:13:17+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO Patent Term Adjustment Reaches 318-Day Average, Tripling Since 2021 to Match 2015 Levels</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/ptab-section101-reversal-rate-squires-doubled-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:12:51+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>PTAB Section 101 Reversal Rate Has Doubled Under Director Squires, Seven Months of Data Confirm</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-ex-parte-reexam-preorder-patent-owner-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:12:16+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO Introduces Pre-Order Submission in Ex Parte Reexamination, Giving Patent Owners a Voice Before SNQ Determination</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-patent-term-adjustment-318-days-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:11:03+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO特許期間調整（PTA）が平均318日に到達——2021年比で3倍に膨張し2015年水準に逆戻り</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/ptab-section101-reversal-rate-squires-doubled/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:10:27+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>PTABの35 U.S.C. §101拒絶覆率、Squires長官就任後に倍増——7ヶ月データが審判官の行動変容を裏付け</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-ex-parte-reexam-preorder-patent-owner/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T18:09:43+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO、職権再審査に「事前提出」手続を新設——特許権者は審理開始決定前に30ページの反論書提出が可能</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/hikma-amarin-supreme-court-skinny-label-argument-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:12:53+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Supreme Court to Hear Hikma v. Amarin on April 29, Weighing Skinny Label and Induced Infringement</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/hikma-amarin-supreme-court-skinny-label-argument/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:12:20+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>米最高裁、スキニーラベルと誘導侵害を問うHikma対Amarin事件の口頭弁論を4月29日に実施</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/vlsi-intel-cafc-noninfringement-reversal-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:11:32+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Reverses Noninfringement Rulings Against VLSI in Precedential Intel Decision</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/vlsi-intel-cafc-noninfringement-reversal-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-27T08:11:00+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>連邦巡回控訴裁、VLSI対Intel特許訴訟で域外適用・均等論の棄却判決を逆転——カリフォルニア案件を差し戻し</news:title></news:news></url>
</urlset>
