<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/wp-content/plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/assets/sitemap-news.xsl?ver=5.7.2"?>
<!-- generated-on="2026-04-10T22:49:12+00:00" -->
<!-- generator="XML Sitemap & Google News for WordPress" -->
<!-- generator-url="https://status301.net/wordpress-plugins/xml-sitemap-feed/" -->
<!-- generator-version="5.7.2" -->
<urlset xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9" xmlns:news="http://www.google.com/schemas/sitemap-news/0.9" >
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-digital-ui-design-patent-requirement-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-11T02:05:35+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO Loosens Design Patent Requirements for Digital UIs and Icons (March 2026)</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-digital-ui-design-patent-requirement-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-11T02:05:29+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO、デジタルUI・アイコンの意匠特許要件を緩和（2026年3月）</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/ptab-odp-allergan-ex-parte-baurin-arp-review-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T18:16:04+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Can a Later-Filed Patent Ground an ODP Rejection? USPTO ARP Reviews PTAB&#8217;s Allergan Reading in Ex Parte Baurin</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/ptab-odp-allergan-ex-parte-baurin-arp-review/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T18:15:30+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>「後出し特許」をODP参照特許として使えるか——PTABのAllergan解釈をARPが再審査、教授陣が対立意見</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/cafc-fuente-vaporous-x-mark-trademark-confusion-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T18:14:30+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>CAFC Holds &#8216;X Dot&#8217; Vape Mark Not Confusingly Similar to Cigar&#8217;s &#8216;X&#8217; Trademark in Precedential Ruling</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/cafc-fuente-vaporous-x-mark-trademark-confusion/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T18:13:55+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>電子タバコの「X印」はシガーの「X」商標と混同を生じない——CAFCが先例拘束力ある商標判決</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/fortress-iron-omitted-inventor-patent-invalid-federal-circuit-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T08:08:22+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit: Unreachable Coinventor = Invalid Patent—Strict Construction of 35 U.S.C. Section 256(b) in Fortress Iron v. Digger Specialties</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/fortress-iron-omitted-inventor-patent-invalid-federal-circuit/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T08:08:04+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>【Federal Circuit判決】オミットされた共同発明者が見つからない場合、特許は無効——Fortress Iron事件で第256条(b)要件の厳格性が確定</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/epo-fee-increase-april-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T08:07:43+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>European Patent Office Implements 5% Fee Increase Effective April 1—Reflects Surge in AI and Semiconductor Filings</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/epo-fee-increase-april-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T08:07:29+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>欧州特許庁（EPO）手数料が4月1日から約5％値上げ——AI関連出願急増で業務量増加</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/nintendo-character-summon-patent-uspto-rejection-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T02:05:07+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Nintendo&#8217;s Character-Summon Patent Rejected in Full: All 26 USPTO Claims Refused</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/nintendo-character-summon-patent-uspto-rejection/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-10T02:05:05+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>任天堂「キャラクター召喚」特許、USPTO全26クレーム却下</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/huawei-wi-fi-7-patent-leadership-sep-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T18:08:15+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Huawei Leads Wi-Fi 7 Patent Race—Commanding SEP Position Across Consumer Electronics</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/huawei-wi-fi-7-patent-leadership-sep/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T18:08:13+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Huaweiが「Wi-Fi 7」特許レースで首位——LG・Intel・Qualcommを抑え、標準必須特許の主導権を確立</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/sail-ai-foundation-foundation-model-patents-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T18:08:11+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Five AI Leaders Launch Shared AI License Foundation (SAIL) with 33,000 Foundation Model Patents</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/sail-ai-foundation-foundation-model-patents/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T18:08:10+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>AI企業5社が協調特許ライセンス基盤SAIL を発足——33,000のAI基盤モデル特許を共有ライセンス</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/federal-circuit-mcfadden-section-101-information-exchange-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:12:29+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit Rejects Information Exchange Patent — Abstract Ideas on Generic Computers Remain Ineligible</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/federal-circuit-mcfadden-section-101-information-exchange/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:12:10+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>Federal Circuit、情報交換システム特許の適格性をあらためて否定――「汎用コンピュータ上の抽象的な思想」は保護されない</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/samsung-netlist-sep-antitrust-doj-statement-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:12:09+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>U.S. Justice Department Supports SEP Holder in Samsung-Netlist FRAND Dispute — Antitrust Violation Does Not Follow From Breach of Licensing Obligation</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/samsung-netlist-sep-antitrust-doj-statement/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:11:27+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>政府が標準必須特許のFRAND濫用訴訟で特許権者側を支持――Samsung対Netlist事件で米国司法省が意見書提出</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/en/uspto-ipr-institution-rate-drop-2026-en/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>en</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:11:26+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO&#8217;s IPR Institution Rate Crisis — Plummeting from 65% to 37% in Seven Months</news:title></news:news></url>
<url><loc>https://www.patent-detectives.com/uspto-ipr-institution-rate-drop-2026/</loc><news:news><news:publication><news:name>パテント探偵社</news:name><news:language>ja</news:language></news:publication><news:publication_date>2026-04-09T08:10:49+09:00</news:publication_date><news:title>USPTO特許無効審判（IPR）の機関決定率が急落――65%から37%へ、7ヶ月で43%減少</news:title></news:news></url>
</urlset>
